Automation in Dynamic Application Security Testing: A Comprehensive Engineer’s Handbook

Innovating Software Development: The Symbiosis of Speed and Security

In today’s fast-paced software development landscape, the need for speed must be balanced with the imperative of security. The rapid deployment of code by teams presents a double-edged sword – while it accelerates progress, it also opens the door to potential security vulnerabilities if not handled with care. Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) emerges as a crucial tool in identifying and addressing security flaws in operational applications. However, manual DAST scans often prove to be cumbersome and time-consuming, creating bottlenecks that impede the agility they are designed to support.

Automating DAST emerges as the ultimate solution to this conundrum. By seamlessly integrating security testing into the development pipeline, engineering and DevOps teams can proactively detect and rectify vulnerabilities without compromising on velocity. This comprehensive guide serves as a roadmap for automating DAST, encompassing the advantages it offers and the strategies for seamless implementation within your CI/CD workflow.

The Limitations of Manual DAST Scans

Traditionally, DAST scans were relegated to the final stages of development, often conducted by specialized security teams. However, this outdated approach is no longer tenable for modern tech enterprises. Manual DAST scans give rise to several critical challenges:

• Delayed feedback: Manual scans result in delayed feedback on vulnerabilities, sometimes spanning days or weeks. By the time issues are identified, the code has progressed, rendering remediation more complex and costly. The OWASP Foundation underscores how delayed vulnerability discovery hampers mitigation efforts and elevates risk.
• Scalability hurdles: As organizations expand and the number of applications proliferate, manually managing DAST scans becomes unmanageable. This approach fails to align with the rapid evolution of cloud-native development. According to a US Department of Homeland Security report, manual processes struggle to support the escalating complexity and interconnectivity of applications.
• Inconsistent coverage: Human errors frequently plague manual processes, leading to overlooked scans, misconfigurations, or incomplete testing across relevant environments, resulting in security blind spots.
• Developer disruption: Dumping a lengthy list of vulnerabilities on developers disrupts their workflow, forcing them to shift focus from ongoing tasks to rectifying issues in older code, leading to diminished productivity.

These challenges engender friction between development and security teams, positioning security as a hindrance rather than a shared responsibility.

The Imperative of Automating DAST: Key Advantages

Automating DAST heralds a paradigm shift, transforming it from a late-stage gatekeeper to an integrated component of the development lifecycle, delivering immediate and profound benefits:

Enhanced Efficiency and Velocity

By embedding DAST scans within the CI/CD pipeline, tests are automatically conducted with every code commit or deployment. This real-time feedback equips developers with instant insights into the security implications of their modifications, eliminating manual delays and handovers, enabling teams to sustain their development momentum. Vulnerabilities are identified and remedied at the earliest juncture when they are most manageable and cost-effective.

Elevated Security and Comprehensive Coverage

Automation ensures consistent and exhaustive security testing. Automated scans can be configured to target development, staging, and production environments, ensuring continuous coverage across the application landscape. This methodical approach minimizes human errors and guarantees that no application remains untested. Selecting the right DAST tools enables seamless configuration and reliable execution, bolstering the overall security posture.

Scalability for Expanding Teams

For companies scaling from 50 to 500 developers, manual security processes prove inadequate. Automation becomes indispensable for overseeing security across myriad applications and microservices. An automated DAST workflow effortlessly scales alongside your team and infrastructure, ensuring new projects inherit standardized security testing protocols, fostering governance and consistency without added manual burdens.

Empowering Developers

Automating DAST within the pipeline ingrains security as a natural facet of a developer’s workflow. Results seamlessly integrate into familiar tools like GitHub or GitLab. This “Shift Left” approach empowers developers to assume ownership of their code’s security, cultivating a culture where security is a collective responsibility rather than the exclusive domain of a segregated team.

A Pragmatic Approach to Implementing DAST Automation

Embarking on the automation journey with DAST need not be daunting. Here are actionable steps to seamlessly integrate it into your CI/CD pipeline. For a comprehensive overview of best practices and leading tools, the OWASP DAST overview serves as an excellent starting point.

1. Select the Appropriate DAST Tool

The initial step involves choosing a DAST tool that aligns with your team’s requirements. Seek solutions designed for automation, considering key features such as:

• CI/CD integration: Opt for tools with seamless integrations with prevalent CI/CD platforms like Jenkins, GitLab CI, GitHub Actions, and CircleCI.
• API-centric: An API-first approach allows for extensive customization and precise control over scan triggers and parameters.
• Rapid scans: Prioritize tools optimized for speed to avert becoming a bottleneck in the pipeline. Some tools offer targeted scanning functionalities to assess only altered components.
• Minimal false positives: A profusion of false positives can lead to alert fatigue. Opt for a tool renowned for accuracy to ensure the team focuses on genuine threats.

For insights into real-world implementations, the Google Cloud blog on integrating DAST in CI/CD elucidates how extensive engineering teams approach DAST automation on an enterprise scale.

2. Integration into the CI/CD Pipeline

Following tool selection, the subsequent step involves seamless integration. A common strategy is to introduce a DAST scanning phase to your pipeline. The typical workflow encompasses:

1. Build: The CI server fetches the latest code and constructs the application.
2. Deployment to staging: The application is automatically deployed to a dedicated testing or staging environment mirroring production conditions as closely as viable.
3. Initiate DAST scan: The CI pipeline triggers the DAST tool either via an API call or a preconfigured plugin, scanning the operational application in the staging environment.
4. Analysis of results: The pipeline awaits the scan’s conclusion, with rules set to automatically halt the build if critical or high-severity vulnerabilities are detected.
5. Reporting and remediation: Scan outcomes are relayed to developers through integrated ticketing systems (like Jira or Linear) or directly within their Git platform, furnishing immediate actionable insights.

3. Commence Small and Iterate

Commencing the automation process incrementally is advisable. Initiate with one or two pivotal applications, utilizing this initial phase to learn and fine-tune the workflow. Configure the scanner to focus on a restricted set of high-impact vulnerabilities, such as the OWASP Top 10.

As team familiarity with the workflow grows, expand the scan scope and extend automation to additional applications. This iterative approach minimizes disruptions and cultivates momentum.

4. Optimize Scans for Pipeline Efficiency

A comprehensive DAST scan can be time-intensive, unsuitable for a standard CI/CD pipeline. To circumvent delays, refine your scanning strategy:

• Incremental scans: Configure scans to evaluate solely the components of the application modified since the prior build.
• Targeted scans: Direct scans toward specific vulnerability categories most pertinent to your application.
• Asynchronous scans: For exhaustive scans, execute them asynchronously (out-of-band) from the primary CI/CD pipeline. For instance, trigger a nightly scan on the staging environment, with results reviewed the subsequent day without impeding deployments.

The Future is Automated

In a realm where software perpetually evolves, security must evolve concomitantly. Manual DAST scanning is a vestige of a bygone era of software development, fostering bottlenecks, lacking scalability, and burdening engineering teams unnecessarily.

By automating DAST and embedding it within the CI/CD pipeline, security transcends being a barrier to becoming an enabler. This integration empowers teams to construct and deploy secure software swiftly and confidently. For any engineering or DevOps professional intent on fortifying their organization’s security stance without compromising pace, automating DAST is no longer merely a best practice – it is an imperative.

Image source: Unsplash