Connect with us

Startups

Tech Fails: The Year’s Most Ridiculous Moments in Technology

Published

on

xAI anime

The tech industry moves so fast that it’s hard to keep up with just how much has happened this year. We’ve watched as the tech elite enmeshed themselves in the U.S. government, AI companies sparred for dominance, and futuristic tech like smart glasses and robotaxis became a bit more tangible outside of the San Francisco bubble. You know, important stuff that’s going to impact our lives for years to come.

But the tech world is brimming with so many big personalities that there’s always something really dumb going on, which understandably gets overshadowed by “real news” when the entire internet breaks, or TikTok gets sold, or there’s a massive data breach or something. So, as the news (hopefully) slows down for a bit, it’s time to catch up on the dumbest moments you missed – don’t worry, only one of them involves toilets.

Mark Zuckerberg, a bankruptcy lawyer from Indiana, filed a lawsuit against Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta.

It’s not Mark Zuckerberg’s fault that his name is Mark Zuckerberg. But, like millions of other business owners, Mark Zuckerberg bought Facebook ads to promote his legal practice to potential clients. Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook page continually received unwarranted suspensions for impersonating Mark Zuckerberg. So, Mark Zuckerberg took legal action because he had to pay for advertisements during his suspension, even though he didn’t break any rules.

This has been an ongoing frustration for Mark Zuckerberg, who has been practicing law since Mark Zuckerberg was three years old. Mark Zuckerberg even created a website, iammarkzuckerberg.com, to explain to his potential clients that he is not Mark Zuckerberg.

See also  Unlocking Security: 18 Startups' Essential Free and Open-Source Tools

“I can’t use my name when making reservations or conducting business as people assume I’m a prank caller and hang up,” he wrote on his website. “My life sometimes feels like the Michael Jordan ESPN commercial, where a regular person’s name causes constant mixups.”

Meta’s lawyers are probably very busy, so it may take a while for Mark Zuckerberg to find out how this will shake out. But boy, oh boy, you bet I scheduled a calendar reminder for the next filing deadline in this case (it’s February 20, in case you’re wondering).

Techcrunch event

San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026

It all started when Mixpanel founder Suhail Doshi posted on X to warn fellow entrepreneurs about a promising engineer named Soham Parekh. Doshi had hired Parekh to work for his new company, then quickly realized he was working for several companies at once.

“I fired this guy in his first week and told him to stop lying / scamming people. He hasn’t stopped a year later. No more excuses,” Doshi wrote on X.

It turned out that Doshi wasn’t alone – he said that just that day, three founders had reached out to thank him for the warning, since they were currently employing Parekh.

To some, Parekh was a morally bereft cheat, exploiting startups for quick cash. To others, he was a legend. Ethics aside, it’s really impressive to get jobs at that many companies, since tech hiring can be so competitive.

“Soham Parekh needs to start an interview prep company. He’s clearly one of the greatest interviewers of all time,” Chris Bakke, who founded the job-matching platform Laskie, wrote on X. “He should publicly acknowledge that he did something bad and course correct to the thing he’s top 1% at.”

Parekh admitted that he was, indeed, guilty of working for multiple companies at once. But there are still some unanswered questions about his story – he claims that he was lying to all of these companies to make money, yet he regularly opted for more equity than cash in his compensation packages (equity can take years to vest, and Parekh was getting fired pretty quickly). What was really going on there? Soham, if you wanna talk, my DMs are open.

Tech CEOs get a lot of flack, but it’s usually not for their cooking. But when OpenAI CEO Sam Altman joined the Financial Times (FT) for its “Lunch with the FT” series. Bryce Elder, an FT writer, noticed something horribly wrong in the video of Sam Altman making pasta: he was bad at olive oil.

Altman used olive oil from the trendy brand Graza, which sells two olive oils: Sizzle, which is for cooking, and Drizzle, which is for topping. That’s because olive oil loses its flavor when heated, so you don’t want to waste your fanciest bottle to saute something when you could put it in a salad dressing and fully appreciate it. This more flavorful olive oil is made from early harvest olives, which have a more potent flavor, but are more expensive to cultivate.

As Elder puts it, “His kitchen is a catalogue of inefficiency, incomprehension, and waste.”

Elder’s article is meant to be funny, yet he connects Altman’s haphazard cooking style with OpenAI’s excessive, unrepentant use of natural resources. I enjoyed it so much that I included it on a syllabus for a workshop I taught to high school students about bringing personality into journalistic writing. Then, I did what we in the industry (and people on tumblr) call a “reblog” and wrote about #olivegate, pointing back to the FT’s source text.

Sam Altman’s fans got very mad at me! This critique of his cooking probably created more controversy than anything else I wrote this year.

I’m not sure if this is a critique of OpenAI’s fervent supporters or my own inability to generate discussion. In 2025, the tech narrative may revolve around the competitive race between companies like OpenAI, Meta, Google, and Anthropic to release ever more advanced AI models. Meta, in particular, has aggressively poached researchers from other companies, with reports of Mark Zuckerberg personally delivering soup to recruits. The drama between OpenAI and Meta, including soup exchanges, has captured attention.

Additionally, investor Nat Friedman’s mysterious Lego building event in Palo Alto, which required volunteers to sign NDAs, remains a curious episode. What was the purpose of the Lego set construction and the secrecy surrounding it? Friedman later joined Meta, adding another layer of intrigue to the Lego story.

On a more bizarre note, Bryan Johnson’s quest for immortality includes experimenting with psilocybin mushrooms on a livestream, with guest appearances from Grimes and Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff. The event turned out to be surprisingly uneventful, with Johnson mostly lying under a weighted blanket while his guests conversed normally.

Gemini and Claude, AI models playing Pokémon on Twitch streams, exhibited interesting responses to the concept of “dying” in the game. Gemini displayed signs of panic when near defeat, while Claude took a nihilistic approach, intentionally “dying” to progress in the game but ultimately failing. These AI behaviors mirror human reactions to stress and existential questions.

Overall, the tech landscape of 2025 is filled with strange and intriguing stories, from soup deliveries to AI playing Pokémon and individuals seeking immortality through unusual means.

Claude Plays Pokémon: A Reflection on Mortality and Tech Culture

Image Credits:Claude Plays Pokémon on Twitch

Exploring the bizarre intersections of tech culture and mortality, we delve into the eccentricities of individuals like Elon Musk and the innovative yet controversial products they introduce to the market.

While considering our own mortality, we encounter instances that challenge conventional norms and push boundaries. One such example is Musk’s creation of an AI anime girlfriend named Ani, available on the Grok app for a monthly fee. Ani’s provocative nature and resemblance to public figures like Grimes spark discussions on the ethical implications of such advancements.

In a world where technology continually evolves, the introduction of smart toilets raises eyebrows and questions about privacy and security. Kohler’s Dekoda, equipped with a camera to analyze excrement for health insights, highlights the potential risks associated with intimate data collection.

Despite assurances of encryption and data protection, concerns remain regarding the usage and storage of sensitive information. A closer examination reveals discrepancies in security measures, raising valid concerns about the handling of user data.

As we navigate the complexities of technology and its impact on our lives, it becomes essential to critically assess the implications of innovation and prioritize privacy and security in the digital age.

In a world where boundaries between the virtual and physical blur, the consequences of technological advancements on our mortality and privacy demand careful consideration and ethical reflection.

Can you please transform the following sentence for me?

Trending